What Big Pharma Doesn't Want You To Know
Take Control With Insider Information

What Experts Really Have to Say About the Atkins Diet


When Dr. Robert Atkins introduced the Atkins Diet in 1972, it started one of the largest controversies experienced within the nutrition community. His solution for those who were experiencing problems with other diets was to start a low-carb diet. A low-carb diet would remove the food cravings, thereby eliminating the temptation to overeat, which was ruining whatever diet you were on. You might be thinking it sounds all right. But if you are not eating carbs you have to then focus on what you actually are eating. That is the part where the diet encourages eating low-carb food, which then tends to include excessive amounts of fatty foods.

Interestingly enough, as you might know, it worked for many. There are currently millions of success stories circulating around the world and the Internet, of people trying this diet, and actually losing a substantial amount of weight. A recent study, between three diets, Atkins, Mediterranean, and Low-fat showed that those on the Atkins diet lost more weight than those on the other two diets. Many have called the results of this study into question however, because the study was partially funded by none other than Doctor Robert Atkins. You might wonder why it matters who funded the study. When you take a look at who is disagreeing with the Atkins diet you see where the controversy really lies.

The American Heart Association (AHA) states that the only way to lose weight and stay healthy is to cut out the fat in your diet. Furthermore, they state that while it's true you may lose weight on this diet, the effects of consuming so much protein and fat would be dangerous for your body,...

This Content is restricted to our Community.
Login or Sign Up for an account to continue reading!




Bookmark and Share



Related Stories



Notice (8): Undefined variable: uid [APP/views/articles/view.ctp, line 97]

Enter your Comment and click the "Submit" Button:


Comments

Martin
Martin
July 13, 2009
What I don't understand is the either-or principle. Why is it assumed that a person is going to only eat protein? Wouldn't just using the diet to get to a desired weight or circumstance be enough? Then go to the balanced diet that so many seem to believe is best.
I see this in so many different arena's. Politics, Religion, Food, Medicine. Does any part of life always need or even respond well to extremes? When does something always work or never work?
Discrimination and exploration are at the heart of the human experience. It is why we are here.